Home > The distribution of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville) and its predators on Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia: The implications for top-down control in an intact reef system

The distribution of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville) and its predators on Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia: The implications for top-down control in an intact reef system


Posted on 12 March 2013

TitleThe distribution of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville) and its predators on Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia: The implications for top-down control in an intact reef system
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsJohansson, CL, Bellwood DR, Depczynski M, Hoey AS
JournalJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Volume442
Start Page39
Date Published04/2013
KeywordsBalistidae, coral reef, Predation, Sea urchins, Tethering experiment, Water flow
AbstractFish predation is often cited as a key process in structuring sea urchin populations on coral reefs, with population outbreaks often being related to the removal of key predators through overfishing. However, moderate–high densities of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei have been reported on a reef with relatively intact predator assemblages; Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. This study examined the relationship between the densities of E. mathaei and its potential predators, to gain some insight into the potential role of predation in structuring E. mathaei populations on Ningaloo Reef. To identify potential urchin predators we recorded predation events on tethered E. mathaei using stationary video cameras. Seven fish species preyed on the tethered urchins with two labrid species, Coris aygula and Choerodon rubescens, accounting for 65% of all observed predation events. There was, however, no evidence for the role of predation in determining E. mathaei populations either within or among habitats. Despite the densities of E. mathaei varying from 0.1 to 219.7 ind 100 m− 2 among habitats, the density and biomass of potential urchin predators displayed limited variation among habitats. Furthermore, the density of E. mathaei was positively related to that of their predators on the reef slope and the back reef. While the overall density of potential predators (53.3 ind ha− 1) was comparable to other protected reefs, the suite of predators differed from that of other regions. In particular, large triggerfish species (f. Balistidae), the dominant predators of E. mathaei on other Indo-Pacific reefs, were rare or absent. While the lack of these species may have contributed to the moderate–high densities of E. mathaei on Ningaloo Reef, other factors such as larval supply, food availability and habitat characteristics may be important. Irrespective of the mechanisms, moderate–high densities of E. mathaei should not be universally viewed as an indicator of reef degradation.
URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098113000397
DOI10.1016/j.jembe.2013.01.027